EVE Search - What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 61	Posted - 2014.01.22 15:42:00 - [1] - Quote Kimmi Chan wrote: baltec1 wrote: Words Other words Ive seen mission agents in Null So, like, wtf?
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 72	Posted - 2014.01.22 18:33:00 - [2] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Ever tried to run them? Ever seen any in sov nul? 1) No, the Nullgimps make that hard and refuse to even consider a deal 2) No, and the Nullgimps make it hard to go and look anyway. But I would imagine the LP rewards from agents in NPC Null are superior to the non-existant LP rewards from the non-existant agents in Sov Null.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 18:57:00 - [3] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Billy McCandless wrote: the non-existant LP rewards from the non-existant agents in Sov Null. There are no mission agents in sov null sec. Yup I believe I said that
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 19:06:00 - [4] - Quote baltec1 wrote: So that means no LP. The issue is with anoms in sov space, not the handful of NPC null missions. Then I apologise for misunderstanding you, I missed where we were talking about the differences between Sov Null and NPC Null. So why not just pop into NPC Null for your LP?
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 19:08:00 - [5] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: How do you call someone else a gimp when it's you who failed to do what you wanted to (run a null sec mission) not them? I run null sec missions when I choose to and have yet to lose a mission ship in NPC Delve, Fountain, Curse or Venal. it's easy when you know how to play the game and aren't scared of other people.... I wasnt aware that "gimp" was slang for someone who cant do something. I have been unable to do so due to losses, so kudos to you for being the better pilot, but there's no need to be a jerk about it.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 19:16:00 - [6] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Billy McCandless wrote: So why not just pop into NPC Null for your LP? Not only can these handful of systems not support tens of thousand players but if we even try they will be **** caged by every hostile power going. Plus it does not fix the problem of the vast bulk of null sec being useless. Ok cool, I now understand. Thanks
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 19:39:00 - [7] - Quote baltec1 wrote: This is about game balance. If there is no reason to go to null then people will not go to null, if the only way to fix the game is to nerf high sec then thats what must happen. Well thats one reason not to go. As we both pointed out, its hard to do much if you are just going to get shot to pieces. Maybe Jenn can give me some tips on how to avoid the CoT system-sweeping fleets.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 19:57:00 - [8] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Why on earth would they not shoot you? Given the existence of cyno ships, neutral is as good as hostile. Apparently, they dont shoot Jenn I was hoping for her secret. But sadly its not forth-coming. Just old tried and tested (and failing) options. Looks like I shall have to devise my own. Oh wait, I DO kill probers in Nullsec Silly me, how did I forget. Maybe some enterprising soul will use the same technique to kill Null Missioners. Its easy, so Im suprised they dont already.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 20:08:00 - [9] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Well, first of all, Jenn is a dude. Secondly, the trick is not getting caught. Knowing and using the MWD+Cloak trick, watching for probes, and judicious use of DotLan to avoid potential gatecamp systems tends to work fairly well. So, it's not that they wouldn't shoot Jenn, it's that he doesn't give them a chance to do it. Well she looks like a female to me And I guess they dont do what Donny Dont Does And Im not sure that you could call it a "trick" anymore.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 73	Posted - 2014.01.22 20:23:00 - [10] - Quote baltec1 wrote: MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is about game balance. If there is no reason to go to null then people will not go to null, if the only way to fix the game is to nerf high sec then thats what must happen. If I were a betting man, I'd bet the primary reason most people don't head to null is because of the ****** politics and asshattery that is perceived to go on there, whether true or not. I for one, don't want to surrender my autonomy and my fun/play time to someone else. You want more people in null? What have you done to change that perception? What has your alliance done to change that perception, besides admitting that its goal is to ruin everyone else's game ? Well there is the fact that we have made CCP fix several bugs and pushed to fix several more broken areas. Yes but more to the point, are you more concerned with your own profitability in your space, or are you saying it would be better for all if more people went there? Im just of the opinion that while, I accept, its possible to mission scan and even mine in null, without doing the Grand Alliance dance (Im avoiding the G word cos it offends Jenn for some reason), its impossible for anyone to live there. So, this leaves the situation that Grand Alliances can live there but not profit and small operators can profit but not live there. Thats certainly how it seems to be falling.

Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 07:30:00 - [11] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: Most likely CCP would loose a big portion of their revenue which would mean their stock would decrease and it would lead to staff layoffs which would cut the game developement and eventualy it would lead to the point where the game would only be played by few "elite nerds" who like to blow each other up. So please do remove high sec... I hope it turns out nicely for you. Why? You WANT the things you prophesised to come true? Why are you playing if you want the game to fail?
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 08:55:00 - [12] - Quote Tauranon wrote: ie any person playing this game on a character without a massive blatant history of awoxing will have no trouble accessing null, getting themselves half-a-donut sized blue list, and having either CFC, PL or N3 protect them from needing to engage in SOV warfare. . PFFFno Just... no lol That's the single most laughable statement I think Ive ever heard.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 09:39:00 - [13] - Quote Tauranon wrote: I can't possibly imagine - given that I'm perfectly aware of who plays in pblrd, since I'm privvy to the alliance chat, that any person could not find an actively recruiting corp out of the 80+ who would take them and even on the utterly distant chance that someone failed at that, there are other easily located renting alliances equally full of moderate standard corps. I've got absolutely no idea why you'd even post that dribble. I think you will find the word is "drivel" And I posted it because its true. None of the groups you have quoted have open recruitment, and they would be mad to, if they did.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 09:44:00 - [14] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: I don't want the game to fail....... it's not something I would want to see Azrael Dinn wrote: So please do remove high sec... I hope it turns out nicely for you. Whatever you say Jack, you're the Master Race
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 09:54:00 - [15] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: Oh dear god... how do people like you even born and survive the childhood. Personal attacks, nice :) If you could stick to answering the question, that would be great. I see you must do well communicating with human beings. Also, I notice you are against the reduction in safety of High Sec in this thread, but for the removal of cloaks as a method for safe transversal of low sec in another thread. How do you rationalise these two views and the possibility they could be seen as being in direct opposition of each other?
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 113	Posted - 2014.01.27 10:16:00 - [16] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: How I communicate is my bussiness and my bussiness alone and if you don't like it then it's one of your problems... again. No it isn't. Its the business of you and those who you communicate with, unless you are of the belief that you say something and that makes it a fact. Is communication a one-way street for you? Azrael Dinn wrote: I do not need rationalise two seperate points of views from two seperate topics as they are complerely different and that is why there is no point of merging them together into a topic where the question is what would happen if high sec would be nerfed. Im perplexed why you think these two topics are unconnected. If Hisec were more dangerous, would cloaking ships not be more useful? It is was safer, would that in any way effect your wish to have their effect reduced in lowsec? I can't understand how one would not effect the other. Azrael Dinn wrote: So please stay on topic mr I'm better communicator than you I have, Im keeping you on topic by asking you not to question my parentage, if thats ok.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 114	Posted - 2014.01.27 11:04:00 - [17] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: Well in your case I see it might best to stay on a one-way street . Again, another personal attack. You are not even making any kind of point here. Azrael Dinn wrote: Though your name "Candless" kinda says it all In what way? Also, its McCandless, I think you will find. Azrael Dinn wrote: But if you have something you want to talk about lowsec cloaking or other cloaking we can talk about those in another topic cause they don't reflect this topic. Ive already explained how one effects the other, which you are now choosing to ignore. Azrael Dinn wrote: Stay on topic which is What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec? and it has nothing to do with your origins. Then don't bring it up then and attempt (unsuccessfully) to derail the topic.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 114	Posted - 2014.01.27 11:05:00 - [18] - Quote Tauranon wrote: No dribble was the word I was looking for, I'm a native English speaker, and I am quite capable of selecting the word I want. I didnt realise you wanted the wrong word. Tauranon wrote: I had a casual glance over the recruitment forums, and yes there was a Vale located PBLRD corp recruiting ad on the front page at the time of this post, directly requesting people that want to PVE, and it happens to be a corp I'm familiar with and can vouch for the accuracy of their ad (and no it isn't my corp). perhaps its easier for me to see that, since I immediately recognise the name of the local corps. I can see why you may believe this to be the case.
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 115	Posted - 2014.01.27 13:38:00 - [19] - Quote Azrael Dinn wrote: Your not even worth an answer after that. Good day. I accept your apology
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 180	Posted - 2014.02.01 18:12:00 - [20] - Quote Josef Djugashvilis wrote: You are using the word, 'pubbie' again - is it a cool school yard thing for you? Jenn aWhine y u do dis?

Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 194	Posted - 2014.02.03 17:32:00 - [21] - Quote Kimmi Chan wrote: ESO is scheduled for release on 4-Feb. ESO haz color?
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 205	Posted - 2014.02.05 00:44:00 - [22] - Quote MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: boring waffle entre tane mii u sleg
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 267	Posted - 2014.02.08 16:43:00 - [23] - Quote Pinky Hops wrote: It offers some opposition, just minimal amounts. Somebody has to shoot the rocks. this is troo rox oot smarte me allte tyme wen i dool them in mi egg sumer
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 267	Posted - 2014.02.08 17:24:00 - [24] - Quote i kant weiht to tel mi frends hoo due distrib you shun tha they r dueing PeeVeeEee
Billy McCandless The McCandless Clan Turing Tested 272	Posted - 2014.02.09 02:42:00 - [25] - Quote E-2C Hawkeye wrote: professional forum trolls its troo we gett payd wel for dis

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.